Joe Bartholomew

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

 

About the Scaling Vertices Project, Part 1

I use the process described here to create dot patterns from scaling tile sets. My purpose for making these is art not math. These tilings, or tile patches, are one solution to a problem I encountered while generating tilings as structures for a series of vertex pattern diagrams and boundary diagrams. I needed a way to create greater density changes than I was getting with other tilings. Scaling tile sets solve the problem. This is the first of several tile sets I use. Others are described in Part 2, Part 3 and diagrammed in these Example Tilings.

This example tile set below is closely related to, and can be derived from tilings described by Robert W. Fathauer. Fathauer found two families of self-similar tilings based on segments of regular polygons [1]. One family includes an 18-18-144 triangle that is a segment of a regular decagon. The triangle is the s=10 prototile described by Fathauer. The tile set that I use includes a pentagon as well as the triangle. The pentagon is the shape that remains after removing five s=10 tiles from a regular decagon. Other hexagonal or square prototiles can be combined with triangles to make self-similar tile sets.

Fathauer went on to discover a great variety of fractal tilings that, as tilings, are more interesting than most of those I describe in Part 3 and diagram in these Example Tilings. Unlike Fathauer's discoveries most of these tile sets are either trivial, or they require more than one prototile. My method for developing a tiling is not necessarily straight forward or fixed. My purpose is not to generate interesting fractal diagrams, but to develop often asymmetrical structures for vertex pattern diagrams.

The method I describe here is based on an infinitely scaling tile set consisting of pentagons and 18-18-144 triangle prototiles. The initial pentagon and triangle prototiles are sized so the long side of the 18-18-144 triangle is equal to the pentagon side. Each subsequent pentagon-triangle pair is scaled so that the next pentagon side is equal to the short side of the previous triangle.

Tilings should be edge-to-edge, with no overlaps. Gaps are inevitable, but they should allow lining with infinitely scaled tiles. Tilings will not fill the plane but should be infinitely scalable at the boundaries, as in a fractal. These are actually tile patches, not tessellations. A radially symmetrical tiling might start like the following figure.

Figure 1

Using this scheme, as the boundaries of the tiling grow outwards they form singularities, or gaps surrounded by tiles. The inside edges of these gaps can be continuously and infinitely lined with scaling pentagons and 18-18-144 triangles, or just 18-18-144 triangles.

In the following figure, the two singularities are about to form.

Figure 1

 

In this figure, below, the two singularities are being filled, one with pentagons and triangles, the other with just triangles. Two more singularities have formed.

Figure 1

 

This figure, below, shows a singularity that is filling with scaling 18-18-144 triangles.

Figure 1

 

This figure is an example of the intended application for these tilings. The tilings are a structure for the finished diagram of dots or vertices and what I call extrinsic vertices. This demonstrates the advantage of using a tile set with properties of self-similarity. The changing density of tiles translates to a greater variation in vertex density.

Figure 1

 

The figure above is based on the tiling in the figure below. Being a variation on the original scheme, it introduces a couple of new singularities. These and many other possible singularities can be filled with scaling 18-18-144 triangles to maintain the fractal-like properties of boundaries.

Figure 1

 

An interesting feature of these prototiles is that the ratio of the areas of each pentagon to the next smaller pentagon (or triangle to triangle) is always 3.618... or 2 plus Phi.

Other self-similar tile sets can be based on regular polygons including squares or hexagons. Here's an animation using three scaled sets of three prototiles: http://joebartholomew.com/aniVertices_HSS9.html.

It's possible to create numerous symmetrical tilings with these tiles, but I often choose to create asymmetrical diagrams. I describe a different but related process for creating tilings in Part 2, and give more examples in Part 3. The processes, lattices, and patterns I use are not math. I'm influenced by structures in math, science, architecture, and design, but unconstrained by the rigorousness of math. These diagrams have no practical use or purpose other than art.

Reference

Fathauer, Robert W. (2000). "Self-similar Tilings Based on Prototiles Constructed from Segments of Regular Polygons," presented at the Bridges Conference (July 28-30, 2000, Southwestern College, Winfield, Kansas).
http://www.mathartfun.com/shopsite_sc/store/html/Compendium/Bridges2000.pdf
Also see:
http://www.mathartfun.com/shopsite_sc/store/html/Compendium/encyclopedia.html

 

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

 
 
  Copyright 2010 Joe Bartholomew